ASOGrade vs. Storemaven: App Store Keyword Research Comparison
A side-by-side look at pricing, data accuracy, speed, and storefront coverage between ASOGrade and Storemaven.
Choose Storemaven if you require tier-1 mobile game publishers running multi-million dollar paid install funnels where a 1% conversion lift yields massive revenue.. Choose ASOGrade if your priority is instant, low-cost App Store keyword difficulty and popularity scoring across 109 storefronts.
Tier-1 mobile game publishers running multi-million dollar paid install funnels where a 1% conversion lift yields massive revenue.
Developers optimizing App Store metadata who want fast, unmetered scoring without enterprise complexity.
Comparison at a Glance
| Feature / Capability | ASOGrade | Storemaven |
|---|---|---|
| Target Audience | Indie developers, studios, & ASO marketers | Top-100 grossing gaming studios |
| Keyword Difficulty Engine | Scored across 109 storefronts | Not included |
| Price | $8.25/mo ($99/yr) | Enterprise ($1,500+/mo) |
| Behavioral Scroll Heatmaps | Focused on search metadata | Proprietary testing technology |
The Core Differences Between ASOGrade and Storemaven
When evaluating ASOGrade and Storemaven, the fundamental difference comes down to architecture and focus. Storemaven is designed as an all-encompassing suite offering deep behavioral scroll and video drop-off heatmaps, decade of proprietary mobile cro benchmarking, high-touch consulting and creative design strategy.
In contrast, ASOGrade is engineered for speed and precision during the metadata creation phase. It delivers live Apple Search Ads demand signals and difficulty scores across 109 storefronts in a clean, zero-install browser tab.
Pricing & Value Proposition
Storemaven is priced at Enterprise ($1,500–$5,000+/mo), often with keyword tracking caps and tier restrictions. ASOGrade is $14.99/month or $99/year ($8.25/mo) with full access to all 109 storefronts and 100 keywords per check.
For teams that do not need full-time enterprise intelligence analysts, ASOGrade delivers 90% of the practical keyword value at a fraction of the investment.
Frequently Asked Questions
- Is Storemaven an alternative to ASOGrade?
- Storemaven focuses on visual conversion rate optimization (CRO) for screenshots, whereas ASOGrade focuses on keyword visibility, difficulty scoring, and metadata placement.
- Should I optimize keywords or screenshots first?
- Keywords come first. You must rank in search results before users ever see your screenshots. Use ASOGrade to secure rankings, then optimize visuals for conversion.
More ASO Tool Comparisons
- ASOGrade vs. Guessing on InstinctMoving from gut feel to grounded keyword decisionsRead comparison
- ASOGrade vs. DIY Keyword SpreadsheetsWhat spreadsheet-based ASO does well and where it stallsRead comparison
- ASOGrade vs. Full ASO SuitesThe keyword research pass versus the everything toolRead comparison
- ASOGrade vs. Hiring an ASO AgencyWhen agency-managed ASO makes sense — and when it doesn'tRead comparison
- ASOGrade vs. AppTweakA full App Store and Google Play intelligence suite versus a research-only toolRead comparison
- ASOGrade vs. Sensor TowerEnterprise market intelligence versus a self-serve keyword research toolRead comparison
Try the research pass on its own
Paste 100 keyword ideas and read popularity, difficulty, and competing app count across 109 storefronts — in seconds.
Get started