Is App Store Connect's analytics data enough on its own for keyword research?

No — it only reports on terms you're already ranking for, with no visibility into untried candidates or competitor keyword footprints. It's the essential feedback half of the loop, not a substitute for the research half.

How much lag is there in App Store Connect's search-term analytics?

There's typically a delay of a few days before impression and conversion data by search term becomes available, which is worth factoring in when deciding how soon after a metadata change to check results.

If a keyword has a great popularity and difficulty score but converts poorly in App Store Connect, what should I do?

Trust the real conversion data over the research score. A poor conversion rate on real traffic usually points to a relevance mismatch between the term and your app that a demand/difficulty score can't detect on its own — reconsider whether the term genuinely describes what your app does.

ASOGrade Guide

Reading App Store Connect Analytics Alongside a Keyword Research Tool

What App Store Connect's own impressions, conversion, and retention data tells you that a keyword research tool doesn't, and how to use both together.

Two different vantage points on the same problem

App Store Connect's native analytics shows you what actually happened after your current metadata went live: search impressions and installs by search term, conversion rate, and retention, all specific to your app's real traffic. A keyword research tool shows you the landscape of possibility: which candidate terms have demand, how difficult they are to rank for, and what a competitor's footprint looks like.

Neither view replaces the other. App Store Connect can't tell you about a keyword you're not currently ranking for at all — it only reports on terms already generating impressions for your app. A research tool can't tell you how your actual current metadata is performing in the real world; it can only estimate demand and difficulty for a term in the abstract.

What App Store Connect tells you that a research tool can't

Real conversion rate by search term, when available, is the clearest signal for distinguishing a relevance problem from a difficulty problem. A term generating solid impressions but a conversion rate well below your app's average suggests the traffic isn't well-matched to what your app does, regardless of how favorable its popularity and difficulty scores looked in research.

Retention data tied to acquisition source, where available, can reveal that installs from a particular keyword or campaign retain worse than your average, which is a signal worth feeding back into keyword selection — a term that technically converts but attracts the wrong user isn't a long-term win even if it moves your ranking numbers short-term.

What a research tool tells you that App Store Connect can't

App Store Connect has no visibility into terms you don't currently rank for, which means it can't help with the ideation and gap-finding side of keyword research at all. Discovering that a specific phrase has real demand and low difficulty, before you've ever targeted it, is exactly the blind spot a research tool fills.

It also can't tell you a competitor's keyword footprint, since that data belongs entirely to the competitor's own account. A competitor teardown — reading which searches surface a rival's app — is only possible through the indirect ranking-based approach a research tool uses, not through your own App Store Connect dashboard.

And App Store Connect reports on your current reality with some lag, while a research tool's difficulty score reflects the live competitive set right now, which is the number you need before deciding what to change next, not just what already happened.

Using both in one workflow

Start a research cycle by pulling your current App Store Connect performance: which terms are generating impressions, what's converting, what's retaining. Flag any term with weak conversion or retention despite decent impression volume as a candidate for replacement, independent of its research-tool scores.

Then run your full candidate list — including replacements for flagged underperformers — through popularity and difficulty scoring. After the next metadata update goes live and has time to accumulate data, return to App Store Connect to see how the new terms actually performed, closing the loop.

Frequently asked questions

Is App Store Connect's analytics data enough on its own for keyword research?: No — it only reports on terms you're already ranking for, with no visibility into untried candidates or competitor keyword footprints. It's the essential feedback half of the loop, not a substitute for the research half.
How much lag is there in App Store Connect's search-term analytics?: There's typically a delay of a few days before impression and conversion data by search term becomes available, which is worth factoring in when deciding how soon after a metadata change to check results.
If a keyword has a great popularity and difficulty score but converts poorly in App Store Connect, what should I do?: Trust the real conversion data over the research score. A poor conversion rate on real traffic usually points to a relevance mismatch between the term and your app that a demand/difficulty score can't detect on its own — reconsider whether the term genuinely describes what your app does.

Related resources

More guides

View all guides →

Apply this in your own keyword research

Score App Store keywords by popularity and difficulty across 109 storefronts — the tool behind every strategy in this guide.

Start keyword research